Riemann surface

matlab

还在面临算法和数据结构的学习挑战吗？别担心！我们的algorithm-data-structure-guide团队专业为您解决各种与算法和数据结构相关的问题。我们拥有深厚的专业背景和丰富的经验，能够帮助您完成高水平的作业和论文，让您的学习之路一帆风顺！

以下是一些我们可以帮助您解决的问题：

数据结构：各种常用数据结构的定义、性质和分类，如数组、链表、栈、队列、树等。

算法设计和分析：常见算法设计技巧和分析方法，如贪心算法、动态规划、分治法等。

排序和搜索：各种排序算法和搜索算法的原理、特点和复杂度分析，如快速排序、归并排序、二分搜索等。

图算法：图的表示方法、遍历算法和最短路径算法，如深度优先搜索、广度优先搜索、Dijkstra算法等。

动态数据结构：动态数组、链表、树的实现和操作，如平衡二叉树、堆、哈希表等。

算法优化和高级数据结构：算法优化技巧和高级数据结构的应用，如剪枝、记忆化搜索、红黑树、图的割边割点等。

无论您面临的算法和数据结构问题是什么，我们都会尽力为您提供专业的帮助，确保您的学习之旅顺利无阻！

Suppose you have a collection of $N$ different integer values, where $N$ is at least 2 . If you insert the values into a BST in one order, and then insert the same values into a second BST in a different order, is it possible that the two resulting BSTs will have the same structure? If yes, give an example. If no, explain clearly why not.

Yes, it is possible. For example, consider inserting the values ${50,25,75}$ in that order and then in the order ${50,75,25}$. You get precisely the same tree in both cases.

[25 points] Suppose you have a collection of $N$ different points in the xy-plane, where $N$ is large. If you insert the points into a PR quadtree that does not use buckets, then some of the branches may be very “stalky”. If you insert the same points into a PR quadtree that does use buckets, you would expect that there would be fewer “stalky” branches.

If a bucket size of 4 is used, what would you expect the effect to be on a typical PR quadtree branch? That is, if you compared branches the two trees that contained the same subsets of points, what difference would you expect to see? Quantify your answer if possible; that is, what is the minimum difference you would expect and what is the maximum difference you would expect, and why?

Crudely put, we’d expect that branches in the bucketed tree would be shorter.

More precisely, we’d expect that some branches would be shorter, but not all. In particular, whenever the data set contains four data points that lie within the same quadrant of a region, the bucketed tree will store all four in a single leaf while the unbucketed version will have at least one additional level due to partitioning the quadrant that holds the four points at least once.

As for an upper bound on the shortening effect, that would depend entirely on how tightly bunched the data elements are. Following the result given in the Samet paper and cited in the course notes, if no buckets are used (or bucket size 1 if you prefer), the upper bound on the height of the tree would depend upon the minimum diagonal of a square that contained the four points in question. So, it’s not possible to state a precise upper bound on how many levels would be saved by a bucket size of 4 without having specific information regarding the actual data points to be stored.

**E-mail:** help-assignment@gmail.com **微信:**shuxuejun

**help-assignment™是一个服务全球中国留学生的专业代写公司专注提供稳定可靠的北美、澳洲、英国代写服务专注于数学，统计，金融，经济，计算机科学，物理的作业代写服务**